![]() Fortunately, the cameras also work with the Euf圜am Solar Panel (about $60), which boasts a 13-foot power cable.Īs with many solar cameras we reviewed, you can't remove the battery, which means less charge over time. ![]() And installing on the north side of a house makes it almost impossible to align the panels with the sun. You must account for overhangs and trees so they get enough sun. Still, the top-mounted panels mean you can't install the cameras in any spot. It's even more impressive when you consider that the panels aren't much larger than a credit card. Read our full Reolink Argus 3 Pro review to see how it performed in our hands-on test.ĭuring testing, the built-in solar panels compensated for any battery we used. And as good as the video quality looks, Reolink's narrow field of view and lack of motion zones limit how well it captures recordings. We're not fans of the built-in battery, which gives the solar security camera an expiration date as the battery ages. Reolink doesn't offer an unlimited camera option-most rivals catch up around $10 a month. Plans start at $5 a month for five cameras, which is a better value than base plans from Wyze and Arlo. While Reolink's free cloud storage works only for a single camera, you can add more with a paid plan. In addition to the excellent solar panel, Reolink offers local video storage on a microSD card. Still, it lasted several months on standby during testing-more than we got from Wyze and Arlo. ![]() (All battery-powered security cameras are like this). You'll need the panel because Reolink's battery doesn't last long when recording often. Plus, the 13-foot power cord means you can place the panels and cameras relatively far apart for maximum solar efficiency and camera view. Despite the low price, Reolink's solar panel manages a healthy 3.2 Watts, which makes it more potent than the 2.9-Watt average of panels we looked at.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |